Get the
most out of nhamagazine.com.

Get Firefox

A Scanner Darkly

by DIANA SLAMPYAK

Director: Richard Linklater Based on
the Novel by Philip K. Dick
Starring: Keanu Reeves, Robert Downey, Jr., Woody Harrelson, Winona Ryder and Rory Cochrane
Rated: R
Running Time:
110 minutes
NHA
Review Rating:
3/10 Chopsticks

Watching a man go psychotic should be somewhat captivating. Instead, watching A Scanner Darkly was one hundred and ten of the most tedious minutes I have spent in a theatre in a long time. I love films about drugs and the drug culture but this one just didn't do it for me. Maybe it was the format the interpolated rotoscoping that drove me nuts. Maybe it was a lackluster screenplay based on an extremely dull graphic novel that for some reason is extremely popular. Perhaps it was the pacing. Perhaps it was the sci-fi elements.

Whatever it was: it was dreary watching
A Scanner Darkly.

It is seven years into the future. The war on drugs has become as volatile as the present day war on terror. Undercover cop Bob Arctor (Reeves) reluctantly follows orders to start spying on his friends. Aforementioned friends include: Jim Barris (Downey, Jr.), a babbling freak who prattles endlessly about spies and wanting to shoot people; Ernie Luckman (Harrelson), your usual stoner dude; Donna Hawthorne (Ryder), who turns out to be more than you initially expect; and Charles Freck (Cochrane), a substance D addict. When Arctor is instructed to step up the surveillance on himself, his alternate self comes to light and he is launched into a world of paranoia and absurdity, where it's tough to know who your friends are. And it's hard for the audience to follow, too.

The film plays like a graphic novel come to life with live-action photography overlaid onto an animation process the rotoscoping I spoke of earlier with which Linklater first utilized in Waking Life. This style is visually disturbing with the swaying and swirling of overlaid colors. It is also a gimmick that wears thin pretty quickly.

The pacing is off, too. The movie is intended to be a thriller, but there is nothing really thrilling about it. Linklater isn't at his best here. And he's done some good work the Before Sunrise and Before Sunset series, Dazed and Confused, for example. But this one is utterly forgettable.

More Reviews:
[click on image to
read reviews]
    • Year of the Dog
    • year of the dog
    • From the man who brought us Nacho Libre, The School of Rock...
    • Lonely Hearts
    • lonely heart
    • The title of the film speaks volumes in this abrasive crime drama...
    • Journey from the Fall
    • journey from the fall
    • Writer/Director Ham Tran’s Journey from the Fall captures the harrowing...
    • Close to Home
    • close to home
    • Perhaps the first female buddy army film, the Israeli Close to Home (Karov La Bayit)...
    • Perfume:
      The Story of
      A Murderer
    • perfume
    • From the very first beat of writer/
      director Tom Tykwer’s period piece Perfume...
    • The Dead Girl
    • dead girl
    • When a young girl is found brutally murdered in a small, rural town, the community's...
    • The Grudge 2
    • grudge 2
    • As a typical couple sits down to a breakfast of bacon and eggs, the husband...
    • Volver
    • volver
    • Volver in Spanish means “to return or coming back.” In the film, a mother named Irene...
    • A Scanner Darkly

    • a scanner darkly
    • Watching a man go psychotic should be somewhat captivating. Instead...